See the risk-adjusted NPV, ROI and payback of putting AI humans to work on your website, inside your software and at your events, using your own numbers.
An AI human that can see, speak, remember and explain in your customers' language is easy to demo. It is harder to defend in a budget meeting. This calculator builds that case the way a finance team would: from your own volumes and costs, with sourced benchmarks wherever you don't have a number yet, adjusted for risk and discounted to today's money.
The track record is poor. MIT NANDA's 2025 study found 95% of organisations get no measurable P&L return from generative AI. IBM's 2025 CEO study found only 25% of AI initiatives delivered the ROI expected of them. Gartner predicted at least 30% of generative AI projects would be abandoned after proof of concept.
Business cases usually fail for the same four reasons:
This calculator is built to avoid all four.
It follows the conventions of Forrester's Total Economic Impact (TEI) method, which most CFOs already recognise.
| Use case | Value counted | Default benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| Customer support & IT helpdesk (with screen share) | Contacts resolved without a human × your cost per contact | $7.20 per US live call (ContactBabel 2026); $20.61 per L1 IT ticket (MetricNet 2023); 14% of issues fully resolved in self-service today (Gartner 2024) |
| Corporate training & onboarding | Training hours the AI trainer delivers × cost per hour, plus productive time recovered from faster ramp-up | 13.7 formal hours per employee and $123 per learning hour (ATD) |
| AI tutor & interactive classroom | Tutoring hours delivered × the hourly rate of human tutoring | $35–60 per hour (Wyzant 2025). Tutoring raises achievement by 0.37 SD across 96 randomised trials (NBER). |
| Medical & patient assistant | Clinical staff time returned, plus visits recovered from fewer no-shows | RN median $45/hr (BLS 2024); 23% average no-show rate (Dantas et al., 2018) |
| Sales & product demos | Sales-engineer hours freed, plus gross profit (not revenue) from faster lead response | Sales engineer median $121,520 (BLS 2024). Leads contacted within an hour are 7x likelier to qualify (HBR). |
| Events, kiosks & front desk | Staff hours covered, plus the cost of the extra qualified leads captured | $40–53/hr for brand ambassadors (Event Marketer); about $142 per trade-show lead (CEIR) |
| Learning & knowledge content | Build hours saved by prompt-to-course, deck, quiz and video generation, plus external production spend brought in-house | Training specialist median $31.66/hr (BLS 2024) |
| AI transformation with Coventa | Run-rate cost take-out and gross-profit gains, measured against a frozen baseline | Your own baseline |
Prices marked "indicative" in the calculator are placeholders. Replace them with your quote.
Some gains are real but hard to put a defensible price on, so the calculator leaves them out:
Treat these as upside, not as part of the case.
Sources:
It is as accurate as the baseline you give it. Each default is a published benchmark (ContactBabel, Gartner, ATD, BLS, NBER and others, cited under each field), but your own volumes and costs will always beat an industry average. The method follows Forrester TEI conventions: benefits ramp up over time, are risk-adjusted down, costs are risk-adjusted up, and everything is discounted at your cost of capital.
Vendor case studies report their best deployments. This calculator charges you for every AI conversation minute, including conversations that end up with a person. It also ramps adoption instead of assuming 100% on day one, and it counts gross profit rather than revenue. If a use case does not pay back here, it is worth knowing before you buy. The usual fixes are to route higher-volume work to the AI human, or to move to on-prem pricing at scale.
Leave the benchmark defaults in for a first read, then replace the two or three inputs that move the result most. Usually those are volume, the share the AI human handles, and the cost of today's alternative. Two to four weeks of real data is enough for a board-ready case.
Cloud SaaS has a low entry cost and you pay per conversation minute, so cost tracks usage. That is best for pilots and moderate volumes. On-premises or private cloud swaps per-minute charges for an annual licence plus your own hosting. It usually wins at high volumes, and wherever data must stay inside your environment. Switch the deployment option in step 1 to compare the two.
The payback figure shows the month in which cumulative net cash turns positive under your chosen scenario. Value builds over 4 to 9 months depending on the planning stance. AI transformation programmes allow an extra 3 months to set a baseline and ship. The fastest route to a real number is a focused pilot on one use case against a frozen baseline.
Yes. The medical assistant handles intake, preparation, education and follow-up, with clinicians kept in the loop for anything clinical. For regulated data, the on-premises option keeps conversations and knowledge bases inside your own environment. Review the compliance requirements for your jurisdiction with our team before you go live.
AI humans are often the first AI system an organisation puts in front of people. Coventa (coventa.ai) takes the work further, with an embedded team that re-engineers core processes using AI. Choose the AI transformation use case to model it. Coventa works on its own payroll, hire-and-manage or build-operate-transfer models, and can price scaled work on outcomes verified against a frozen baseline.
It leaves out several gains that are real but hard to price defensibly:
Freed staff time is shown as FTE capacity, not cash.
Yes. Once your results are shown, use "Copy shareable link". Anyone with the link sees the same inputs and results, without signing in. The year-by-year cash flow under the results card gives finance the detail it needs.